i personaly hate wags. and im sick of magazines like 'Now' saying that wags have great fashion sence. i think they look like tacky barbie wanna be whores. i dont see how women with fake boobs, stapled stumochs and so much botox they cant have facial expressions can be fashionable and beautiful. some wags are such bad influences for little girls. like to be famous you must be so faked tanned you look orange, have double d's and live in bodycon dresses. remember the ad for something...i cant remember? but the little girl says "i wanna be a wag" i know a lot of wags arnt like that but generally the majority are. claudine palmer, robbie keanes girlfriend. ohh god. dont get me started. poroxide blonde hair, caked in make-up, orange skin, hidious clothes and waaaayyy too much 'bling'. is that beauty?? imagine seeing audrey hepburn with fake tan and a bodycon?
audrey hepburn was famous for her classic, natural beaty. beauty products, bleach and skin tight clothes do not make beauty!
a lot of people say coleen rooney has great style. like celebs magazine. i really dont think its really that amazing. shes only in her twenties and she dresses like a 30-40 year old. my mum buys the same clothes as her. my mum bought a dress in miss selfridges and she saw coleen wearing it in a mag. my mum was chuffed but im guessing if coleen ever found out somehow she would not be pleased that she has the same fashion sence as my mum.
then theres victoria beckham. i bet her wardrobe is full of tight dresses and taliored shit. since she stoped eating anorexia has become a big issue. i felt threatend by her size 0 frame. i felt shit. a woman who pushed out 3 babies is soo much skinnier than me!
great role model...not!
whenever i hear that some wag has fabulous style i just laugh.
ohh yeah because alexander wang and dior have big boobed, blonde haired orange women on there runway. creating skin tight glittery, rhinestoned clothes. i dont think so!
No comments:
Post a Comment